Zee News
India Edition |International Edition
November 21, 2009
         
We might get a bigger jolt than 1962: Brajesh
Updated on Sunday, November 08, 2009, 10:27 IST Tags:ChinaIndia
Once bitten, twice shy. This saying aptly describes the contours of Sino-India relations. The recent upsurge of verbal attacks and some aggressive posture by China, has revived the nightmares of the 1962 Sino-India war. Would the current tensions lead to a repeat of 1962? Former National Security Advisor, Brajesh Mishra sheds light on this and many other issues in his interview with Zeenews.com’s Swati Chaturvedi. Excerpts:

Swati: Dalai Lama is going to Tawang. This has obviously angered China. Now in the face of these events what should India do?

Brajesh: As far as I know, India has already clarified that it would not let Dalai Lama to indulge in any political theatrics. New Delhi has also made it amply clear that he is free to go anywhere he wishes in the country. Also, this is not the first time that Dalai Lama is visiting Tawang. It is his fifth visit to Tawang.

Swati: There were repeated incidents of border incursions and now the Dalai Lama episode. What do you think is China’s motive behind these repeated border incursions?

Brajesh: In the last two years, China’s attitude towards us has changed a bit. China has taken a hostile stance against India along the Line of Actual Control (LAC). In recent times, their media and even some PLA members have struck an anti-India stance. I think the changed attitude might be due to the Indo-US civil nuclear pact which has led Beijing to think that its position is shrinking in South Asia.

Swati: Is China is trying to subdue India in South Asia?

Brajesh: Yes, this is true. They have always tried to engage us in different problems with our neighbours so that we could never play an active role in South Asia.

Since 1962 we have two fronts – one is China and the other is Pakistan. But then, the two have never worked together.

In 1962, we fought a war with China, then in 1965 and 1971 with Pakistan. Then Kargil happened in 1999. But now both these fronts are simultaneously striking a hostile posture. These two nations are now trying to surround India.

I think, we should equip our forces as soon as possible. Our forces should be properly equipped. We are not doing enough in this regard at the moment and I am afraid that in the next five years we might get a bigger jolt than ’62.

Swati: There is an unprecedented military build up by China in recent years. George Fernandes had called China our enemy no 1. Do you think China is the biggest adversary of India?

Brajesh: Look, we have two enemies – China and Pakistan. And if they work together we would have a bigger problem. Now China even sees Japan also as an adversary. But Japan has the backing of United States, which has covered it under nuclear protection. No we do not have the backing of anyone else. We have to protect ourselves only.

Swati: Tibet used to be the biggest trump card against China in international forums. But we have wasted that card. What do you have to say on this?

Brajesh: Tibet was never our colony. It was used as a buffer zone by the Britishers against Russia. But we cannot continue with policies of yore. We have to discard old policies.

China always wanted to be the number one. It sees itself as number two right now. But United States will continue to rule the roost in coming times in world geopolitical scenario. But Russia too has ambitions. It doesn’t want to be number three. Recently, anti-Russian articles too have appeared in China. It wants to cut its future competitors short before becoming number 1 in the next 25 years.

Swati: Recently China has started a new game of providing separate visas to the residents of Jammu and Kashmir. Why so?

Brajesh: In 1999 (after the Kargill war), they (China) have clearly told Pakistan that the LoC should be respected. After that also they have maintained that the border dispute should be resolved through bilateral dialogue between India and Pakistan. Recently they have even offered to mediate in the issue.

They are now working on some projects in PoK, Ladakh. So this is not a visa issue only. But it is a bigger scheme by Beijing to play a bigger role in the world arena.

Swati: How could we tackle this?

Brajesh: There is only one way. India should continue with its economic reforms, liberalisations to boost its economy. At the same time, we also need to work to strengthen our defence forces.

We have to modernise our Army, Navy and Air Forces properly. Nobody can help us in this regard. It is not that we should enhance our security apparatus to attack someone rather it is to defend ourselves.

Swati: We have not given enough attention to our military capability. Do you think we are ignoring a potential threat?

Brajesh: China is certainly building up its military strength. And of course we are not prepared. We have to do a lot to stop a repetition of 1962.

Swati: Do you think China would attack India?

Brajesh: Attacking India is a different thing altogether but certainly Beijing and Pakistan would work together in the coming years to contain us. We must always remember that they (China) want to be the number one. So we must see all these events in that context.

Swati: Parliament had passed a resolution to bring back the thousands of kilometres (Akashi Chin) of land forcefully taken from India by China. Can we ever see that day?

Brajesh: No. I think if we want to settle our border dispute with China we have to give and take something. Now there are also different theories whether that part of the land was ever part of India or not.

There was a resolution on Kashmir also. People of India are even ready to accept the Line of Control as a permanent border….

Adapted By Anil Kumar Satapathy


Toolbox
aPrint this pages
Post Your Comment     |    aAlert Moderator
Your comment(s) on this article
india is still sleeping the leaders can barely arise above their petty squabbles.there has been no competing think tanks to suggest the long teerm alternatives to the govt even a small step like a chief of defence staff is still not operational due to politics encouraged by babus and politicos after every chinese mischief they go into a huddle to formulate a response,the chinese must be thoroughly enjoying this ineptitude of indians -paratrooper - agra a
I think Brajesh Mishra has summed-up Indo- China-Pakistan relations well. There is no alternative for us than to modernise our defence forces and keep the infrastructures up to date in the border areas, so that we do not have the same problems we had in the 1962 conflict. Besides modernisation of the forces we must re-organise them too. One of the long pending issue is of the CDS (Chief of Defence Staff). This must be done at the earliest as it will ease the communication and the contact points between the services and the govt of the day. -Major (Retd) Virendra Sharma` - Wellington (New Zealand) a
All said and done, though India faces Indo-Pak and Indo-China combined military threat on our borders, yet no undue meaning should be read from China,s verbal hostlle postures in Arunachal Pradesh. Contrary to 1962 debacle, Indian armed forces are fully geared up now to face any challenge from Pakistan and China, either singly or jointly. China is using Pakistan as its stooge, knowing Pakistan`s internal troubles. After India signing Indo-US nuclear deal, China has become wary of India`s potential, militarily or otherwise. Any misadventure by China on our border from Ladakh to Arunachal pradesh will be repelled, effectively by Indian armed forces. The tactical deployment of Indian army and Airforce on Indo-China border is known to China who will be doubly cautious in attacking India which may result into a bloody war, casuing many battle casualties. -PP TALWAR - india a
It is so unfortunite that two great countries like India and China cintinued to fight over old impirial claims. Both India and China have bright futures but they must both move from the past. They can help each other in so many ways if they cooperate and work together. There is saying going like this: If you look to the future, you can expand and progress. If you look back in the past, that is where you will stay. -Ben Gee - Canada a
If China wanted to attack India, Why would China wait till India is armed? If China want any part of India, China would not have stopped in 1962 and would have pushed deep into India instead of stopped at what China considered its border. If India goes back into areas China claim to be its, China will not sit back and do nothing. China wants a negotiated settlement with India on the border issue not war. -Ben Gee - Canada a
Well said Helal. Pakistan is just a weapon in the hands of chinese dictators, who used them well against India. And our leaders fell in those trap as well as Indians. We should stand against China. Its not Arunachal but Tibet should be point of talk between India and PRC. -Pritam - India a
The facts of threats to India is very clear since 1962 to till now but it’s the dirty political game that most of Indians such as political leaders, parties, Medias, organizations as well as citizens are heavily and aggressively focused and doing same till today only about Pakistan. Majorities of People of India living in fake ideology of religious loathing so they are 200% nationalist and ready to die if Pakistan connected to any thing regarding India but shrinks to 40% nationalism when the matter comes about China: a real and beyond imaging enemy of India. Pakistan is only a tool of China. No one shows courage to speak against China. No nation can survive without 100% support of his citizen, we have to have a long vision and equal eye for all Indian by government and other organizations then we can see how each and every citizen (Hindus, Muslims, Sikh, Christian, Buddhist, Jain, Parsi etc) will stand firmly behind our true leader to protect the nation. This is the wakeup time to unit beyond religion, region or political background to reply enemies of India. -Helal Ghazali - Hajipur a