Zee News
India Edition |International Edition
November 22, 2009
         
AIADMK criticise TN govt for not implementing HC directions
Updated on Thursday, November 05, 2009, 13:43 IST Tags:Madras High CourtLawyers clashJayalalithaa
Chennai: AIADMK General Secretary Jayalalithaa on Thursday criticised ruling DMK for not implementing last week's Madras High Court directions asking it to take action against four top police officers indicted for responsible for the February 19 lawyers-police clash.

"The bench named four police officers for suspension and also directed the state government to initiate disciplinary action against them. Almost a week has passed since the judgement was delivered. Yet the court's instructions do not appear to have been carried out," she said.

In a statement here she demanded to know what the government proposed to do. "Chief Minister M Karunanidhi should spell out what action he plans to take," she said.

Karunanidhi also holds the Home portfolio.

She criticised Karunanidhi for 'defending the men in uniform', referring to his recent comments where he said the force "should not be criticised for few isolated incidents even as they faced innumerable challenges while discharging duty."

She said, that it was during her "regime" as Chief Minister that the force was an efficient one, maintaining law and order and ensuring all-round peace. Forest brigand Veerappan was also killed during the AIADMK rule, she said.

A division bench of the High Court on October 29 had held four top police officers including the then city Commissioner K Radhakrishnan "squarely responsible" for the clash and directed state government to suspend them pending disciplinary action.

The court also held the police officials guilty of contempt of court for committing excesses in the High court premises during the clash and causing damage to court property, among other things.

Bureau Report


Toolbox
aPrint this pages
Post Your Comment     |    aAlert Moderator
Your comment(s) on this article
Dear sir, there is no denial about probable excesses of the police force. police never attacked lawyers unless they were provoked by the layers first by brick batting and then by using filthy languages against police.police did come to the court only to enquire about egg throwing on sri Subramaniam swamy. SO the lawyers prvented the uetion of the police duty which according to law is a crime. th honable court kept silent on this issue. one can not deny that there wont be a sound if both the hands do not clap togather. once a lawyer scoulded an honourable judge in the court and nothing happened to him the public of late start thinging that honable judges avoid confrontation with the lawyers and hesitate to enforce punishment. whre as many learned people were sentenced for contempt of court for expressing their opinion which is the consttutional right of the citizen of India. iam in a great confusion that where the judge ment w ill be dlivered whether at the bar council or by thehonable judges in the court. yours sincerely j.radhakrishnan. -J.RADHAKRISHNAN - CHENNAI a